I had planned to add an Olympus 35SP to my kit as a dedicated black and white shooter. But as soon as I got it, I began having problem after problem with it. Either there was a crank advance issue, or the shutter speeds would be off, or the leather fell off. I sent it in to be repair - unfortunately the repair was unsatisfactory so I sent it back.
It was a shame because I liked the lens on the camera, I like some of the shots I was able to salvage from my tests. Then I thought, “Why limit myself with two fixed-lens rangefinders in my kit, when I could enjoy more artistic freedom with an SLR system?â€
And so I headed to OCCamera to see what they had. I was particularly interested in the Olympus OM1, because, well, I’ve been using Olympus cameras lately. But when I saw the OM1 in person I knew I had to have it. Very compact for an SLR, low mirror vibration, quiet shutter, durable, and impressively designed. It contrasted sharply with the Minolta SRT200 I have, especially in regards to noise and mirror slap.
I started with a roll at Laguna Coast Wilderness Park and loved the quality of the results from the common 1:1.8 50mm Zuiko lens. I used some Arista Premium 100 (there are rumors floating around that it’s actually Plus-X), but I left the new orange filter I got on the lens the whole time, foolishly and unnecessarily.
This past week I shot a roll of the AP400 (purported to be Tri-X) and pulled out a nice self portrait as seen below. On Friday it was a roll of AP100 in Old Towne Orange, developed in Rodinal. This series is mainly a sequence of shapes that struck me on my walk. I also snapped a shot of my lovely fiance at Æ’1.8, to test the lens wiiiiide open - the focus on her eyes while her face fades into the creamy bokeh really struck me.
Finally, I tried out some color with the new Ektar 100 yesterday at Quail Botanical Gardens while we scouted out wedding locations. Since no reputable photo shops are open on Sunday, I went to CVS to process the negs. I know, I know, I know, I was really taking chances. But I knew I was taking a risk, and I also knew that the processing would take 20 minutes and not 2 hours-plus like the places I usually go to.
Anyway, I went into CVS, dropped off the roll, and when I returned the clerk said he put my negs in “The little plastic thing.†meaning the canister. When he said this I knew there would be a bunch of fingerprints on the negatives. My suspicious were confirmed when I went home and saw a variety of smudges along with water spots. So I reeled up the roll into my 35mm tank and tossed in some Photo Flo and distilled water. That seemed to do the trick. Scanning was another matter entirely, I must’ve spend over an hour trying to get things to my satisfaction before I could get a workflow going. But all-in-all I was happy from what I was able to pull from the Ektar roll. The film is, however, very high contrast (or it only looks good if high contrast, in my opinion). We’ll see how it performs with some 160NC… and more Tri-X… and, well, with just about anything. Awesome camera, awesome fun.